Circular Design

Circular design differs from traditional design by focusing on sustainability and reuse rather than a linear “take, make, dispose” model.

Here’s how they compare:

• Traditional design follows a linear process—materials are extracted, products are created, used, and then they’re discarded as waste.

• Circular design creates closed loops where products, components, and materials get reused, repaired, or recycled instead of being thrown away.

For example, Fairphone designs modular smartphones where users can replace parts instead of buying a new device. In contrast, traditional smartphones often become electronic waste when a single component fails.

By adopting circular design, companies reduce waste, lower costs, and create more sustainable products.

For more on circular design, take our course: Design For a Better World with Don Norman.

Watch as the Godfather of UX Design, Don Norman explains important points about circular design:

Circular design focuses on sustainability by keeping products, materials, and resources in use for as long as possible. It follows these key principles:

• Design for durability—Create products that last longer and withstand wear and tear.

• Reuse and repair—Make components easy to fix, replace, or repurpose instead of discarding them.

• Recycling and material recovery—Use materials that can be broken down and reprocessed into new products.

• Regenerative resources—Prioritize renewable, biodegradable, or non-toxic materials to minimize environmental impact.

• Modularity and adaptability—Design products with interchangeable parts so users can upgrade or customize instead of replacing them entirely.

• Closed-loop systems—Ensure materials stay in continuous cycles of use rather than ending up as waste.

For example, Patagonia designs clothing with recycled fabrics and offers repairs to extend product life. IKEA experiments with furniture rental programs to keep products in circulation.

By following these principles, designers create more sustainable, cost-effective, and environmentally friendly solutions for users—and for the planet.

For more on circular design, take our course: Design For a Better World with Don Norman.

Watch as the Godfather of UX Design, Don Norman explains important points about circular design:

Circular design keeps products and materials in use longer—thereby reducing waste and supporting a circular economy. Instead of the traditional “take, make, dispose” model, it focuses on reuse, repair, and recycling.

By designing durable and repairable products, brands reduce the need for constant replacement. Modular designs let users upgrade or replace parts instead of discarding entire products. Using recycled or biodegradable materials lowers waste, conserves resources, and helps safeguard the future of the environment.

Businesses benefit, too. Circular design cuts production costs by reusing materials and creates new revenue streams through take-back programs or refurbishing services. Brands like Patagonia repair clothing, and Fairphone makes modular smartphones to extend their lifespan.

A circular economy thrives when companies design with sustainability in mind. Fewer resources go to waste, and products stay valuable longer. This approach reduces environmental impact while driving innovation and long-term growth.

Watch as Don Norman explains important points about the circular economy:

Enjoy our Master Class, Exclusive: Design for a Better World, a Discussion with Don Norman, Founding Director – Design Lab, University of California, San Diego. Co-Founder, Nielsen Norman Group.

Designers create long-lasting products by focusing on durability, repairability, and timeless design.

They choose strong, high-quality materials that resist wear and tear. Reinforced stitching, scratch-resistant coatings, and weatherproof materials help products stay functional over time.

They also design for easy repairs. Modular components let users replace or upgrade parts instead of having to throw the whole product away. Brands like Fairphone and Patagonia make repair kits and replacement parts available to extend product life.

Timeless design plays a role, too. Avoiding trendy styles and unnecessary complexity ensures products remain useful and desirable for years—long after fads have passed.

Last, but not least, designers test products extensively. They simulate real-world conditions to ensure longevity—whether it’s stress-testing a phone’s battery or durability-testing a shoe’s sole.

By prioritizing these factors, designers reduce waste, save consumers money, and create sustainable, high-value products.

Watch as Don Norman explains important points about the circular economy:

Take our course: Design For a Better World with Don Norman.

Circular design focuses on sustainability by keeping products and materials in use longer. Here are some real-world examples:

• Fairphone—A modular smartphone with replaceable parts, letting users repair or upgrade instead of replacing the entire device.

• Patagonia Worn Wear—A program that repairs and resells used clothing, reducing waste and extending product life.

• Adidas Futurecraft Loop—A fully recyclable sneaker designed to be remade into new shoes at the end of its life.

• Loop by TerraCycle—A zero-waste shopping platform that delivers products in reusable packaging, which customers return for cleaning and reuse.

These designs reduce waste, conserve resources, and support a circular economy. By prioritizing durability, repairability, and recyclability, brands—and the designers who take the initiative to design circularly—create more sustainable products that benefit both consumers and the environment.

Read Fairphone’s story.

Watch as Don Norman explains important points about the circular economy:

UX designers can support circular design by making sustainability easy and intuitive for users.

“Circular designers” can create interfaces that encourage repair and reuse—like clear step-by-step repair guides or product tracking apps that show when maintenance is needed. Brands like Fairphone provide user-friendly repair instructions to extend product life.

They can create seamless return and recycling experiences, too. Simple take-back programs, easy-to-find drop-off locations, and reminders for recycling make sustainable choices effortless. IKEA’s Buy Back & Resell program, for example, makes returning used furniture straightforward.

UX designers use nudges and incentives to promote circular behavior. Gamification, rewards for recycling, or clear eco-impact stats help users make greener choices.

By designing for durability, reuse, and recycling, UX designers help businesses and consumers transition to a circular economy. They make sustainability not just possible—but easy and enjoyable, too, and a great way ahead.

Take our course: Design For a Better World with Don Norman.

Watch as Don Norman explains important points about circular design:

Circular design faces challenges that make implementation difficult for businesses and designers.

• High production costs—Durable, repairable, and recyclable materials often cost more than their traditional “counterparts.”

• Consumer habits—Many people still prefer convenience over sustainability, choosing cheap, disposable products instead of long-lasting ones.

• Complex supply chains—Designing for reuse and recycling requires tracking materials across a product’s entire lifecycle, which adds complexity to the process.

• Limited infrastructure—Many regions lack proper recycling, repair, and take-back systems, making circular products (ironically) harder to sustain.

• Company resistance—Some businesses hesitate to adopt circular models because they rely on frequent product sales for revenue, another major “obstacle.”

Despite these challenges, brands like Fairphone, Patagonia, and IKEA show that circular design can work with the right strategies. Educating consumers, improving recycling systems, and shifting business models toward reuse and repair will help overcome these barriers and make brands more “circular” in a circular economy.

Watch as Don Norman explains important points about the circular economy:

Take our course: Design For a Better World with Don Norman.

de Jesus, A., & Mendonça, S. (2018). Lost in transition? Drivers and barriers in the eco-innovation road to the circular economy. Ecological Economics, 145, 75–89.

This paper examines the transition toward a Circular Economy (CE) by analyzing the role of Eco-Innovation (EI). The authors use a dual approach, leveraging both academic literature and policy reports, to identify key drivers and barriers in this shift. The study finds that soft factors—such as institutional, regulatory, and market-driven forces—support the transition, while hard barriers—such as technological constraints, economic lock-ins, and infrastructure limitations—impede it. By adopting a systemic innovation perspective, the authors provide an evidence-based framework for policymakers and businesses. This work is significant in understanding how transformative innovation can facilitate structural economic changes toward sustainability and resilience.

Tecchio, P., McAlister, C., Mathieux, F., & Ardente, F. (2017). In search of standards to support circularity in product policies: A systematic approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 1533–1546.

This paper addresses a critical barrier to the Circular Economy (CE)—the lack of standardized metrics and requirements for resource efficiency in EU product policies. The authors propose a systematic framework to identify standardization needs, ensuring material efficiency requirements are effectively integrated into policy. By categorizing material efficiency into key policy goals—embodied impact reduction, lifetime extension, and residual waste reduction—the study provides a structured approach to sustainable engineering. The framework, tested on electronic displays and washing machines, highlights the role of industry, policymakers, and researchers in shaping CE standards. This research is essential for developing regulations that drive sustainable product design and waste minimization.

McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2002). Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things. North Point Press.

This seminal work challenges traditional manufacturing processes by advocating for a circular approach where products are designed for continuous reuse, either as biological or technical nutrients. The authors propose a paradigm shift from the linear "cradle-to-grave" model to a regenerative "cradle-to-cradle" framework, influencing sustainable design and industrial ecology.

Charter, M. (Ed.). (2019). Designing for the Circular Economy. Routledge.

This comprehensive collection explores strategies and methodologies for integrating circular economy principles into product and service design. It addresses topics such as sustainable materials, business models, and design innovation, providing practical insights for professionals aiming to implement circular practices.

Regulations play a massive role in circular design by pushing companies to reduce waste, improve sustainability, and design for longevity.

• Right-to-repair laws—Call for companies to make spare parts, repair manuals, and tools available so consumers can fix products instead of replacing them.

• Recycling mandates—Make manufacturers use recyclable materials and take responsibility for product disposal. Many countries require electronics and packaging to be recyclable.

• Eco-labeling requirements—Ensure transparency by requiring businesses to disclose environmental impact, helping consumers make informed choices.

• Bans on single-use plastics—Push companies to design reusable or biodegradable alternatives.

• Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR)—Hold companies accountable for a product’s entire lifecycle, encouraging better design and material choices.

For example, the EU’s Circular Economy Action Plan drives sustainable product design across industries. Regulations like these encourage companies to adopt circular practices, benefiting both consumers and the environment.

Read this piece about how the EU’s circular action plan paves the way for a cleaner and more competitive Europe.